CNN's explainer on gender-inclusive phrases, including "pregnant people" and "penis owners," has ignited debate, with some criticizing the use of such terms as confusing or unnecessary.
**1.** CNN's recent release of an explainer discussing new phrases designed for gender inclusivity has sparked controversy and raised questions about the need for such terminology. Terms such as "pregnant people" and "penis owners" have drawn criticism from some who argue that they are confusing or unnecessary.
**2.** The explainer, published in CNN's health section, explored the reasons behind the use of gender-inclusive language and cited experts advocating for its use. According to Keygan Miller, director of public training at The Trevor Project, the increasing use of these terms reflects evolving understandings of gender and the need for inclusivity.
**3.** Dr. Jack Drescher, clinical professor of psychiatry at Columbia University, emphasized the importance of inclusive language in ensuring that individuals feel seen and respected, regardless of their gender identity. He argued that the use of terms like "pregnant people" allows for a wider and more accurate representation of those who can become pregnant.
**4.** Dr. Dennis Baron, professor emeritus of English and Linguistics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, stressed the significance of using gender-inclusive terms as a matter of both inclusivity and medical accuracy. He explained that such terminology helps ensure that patients feel recognized and understood by healthcare providers.
**5.** The article countered the argument that gender-inclusive terminology is "made up" by highlighting that all language is constructed and subject to change. Dr. Baron emphasized that the creation of new terms reflects the need for expression and representation in an evolving societal landscape.
**6.** Drescher argued that gender-inclusive language does not diminish the experiences of the majority population (i.e., ciswomen and cismen) due to their numerical prevalence. He asserted that the use of inclusive terms allows for a more nuanced and comprehensive representation of all individuals.
**7.** The article also cited Miller's critique of statements asserting that "only women can get pregnant." Miller argued that such statements could inadvertently imply that ciswomen who cannot conceive are not fully women, reinforcing narrow and potentially harmful gender stereotypes.
**8.** CNN's exploration of gender-inclusive language aligns with its previous publication of a "guide to neopronouns." The guide aimed to introduce readers to alternative pronouns that aim to eliminate gender markers and promote inclusivity.
**9.** Fox News's Yael Halon contributed to this report, providing a balanced perspective on the controversy surrounding gender-inclusive terminology. The article acknowledges the diversity of viewpoints on this issue and presents both supportive and critical voices.
**10.** The ongoing debate over gender-inclusive language underscores the evolving understanding of gender identities and the importance of fostering inclusivity and respect within our society. It highlights the need for open and nuanced discussions that consider the experiences and perspectives of all individuals.
