CNN's Cooper Expresses Doubts About Cohen's Testimony, Citing Cross-Examination Discrepancy

CNN anchor Anderson Cooper has raised concerns about the credibility of Michael Cohen's testimony in the Trump trial, acknowledging that he would have doubts if he were a juror. The doubts stem from a discrepancy revealed during Cohen's cross-examination.

CNN's Cooper Expresses Doubts About Cohen's Testimony, Citing Cross-Examination Discrepancy

CNN anchor Anderson Cooper has voiced doubts about the trustworthiness of Michael Cohen's testimony in the Trump trial, admitting that he would have reservations if he were a member of the jury.

Cooper's reservations stem from a notable moment during Cohen's cross-examination, which he described as Trump's lawyer catching Cohen in a lie. The discrepancy involved Cohen's alleged phone call to Trump regarding the payment to Stormy Daniels.

CNN's Cooper Expresses Doubts About Cohen's Testimony, Citing Cross-Examination Discrepancy

During cross-examination, Trump's lawyer, Todd Blanche, presented text messages that contradicted Cohen's earlier testimony. The messages showed that Cohen had contacted Trump's former bodyguard, Keith Schiller, to discuss a 14-year-old prankster. This contradicted Cohen's claim that the call was solely to relay information about the payment to Daniels.

Cooper expressed his belief that the discrepancy would have a significant impact on Cohen's credibility in the eyes of potential jurors. "If I was a juror in this case watching that, I would think, this guy's making this up as he's going along, or he's making this particular story up," Cooper stated.

CNN's Cooper Expresses Doubts About Cohen's Testimony, Citing Cross-Examination Discrepancy

Cooper's comments highlight the importance of cross-examination in legal proceedings, as it can reveal inconsistencies or discrepancies in witness testimony. In this case, the discrepancy brought into question Cohen's reliability as a witness.

The stakes are high in the Trump trial, as the outcome will have a significant impact on the former president's legacy. Cohen's testimony is crucial to the prosecution's case, as he is a key witness to Trump's alleged involvement in the payment to Daniels.

However, the cross-examination has raised legitimate doubts about Cohen's credibility, which could ultimately weaken the prosecution's case. It remains to be seen how the jury will weigh the evidence and determine the truthfulness of Cohen's testimony.

The trial is expected to continue for several more weeks, with both sides presenting their evidence and arguments. The outcome will likely have a profound impact on the political landscape and the future of Donald Trump.