Pro Football Hall of Famer Emmitt Smith has fiercely criticized his alma mater, the University of Florida, for eliminating all Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) roles. Smith's scathing remarks stem from a newly passed state law banning DEI programs and his belief that the university is prioritizing politics over inclusivity.
Pro Football Hall of Famer Emmitt Smith has vehemently condemned his alma mater, the University of Florida, for its decision to eliminate all Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) roles at the school. Smith, a three-time Super Bowl champion and the NFL's all-time leading rusher, expressed his outrage in an interview with USA TODAY Sports, stating that the university's actions were "out of spite and sheer power."
Smith's criticism stems from a controversial state law passed in 2023 that prohibits Florida's public universities and colleges from any spending on DEI initiatives. The law has drawn widespread criticism from educators and civil rights organizations, who argue that it will hinder efforts to promote diversity and inclusion on campus.
According to Smith, the university's decision to comply with the law is a betrayal of its values and mission. "This country was built on people fighting for what is right for everybody, not just a select few," Smith said. "To the fullest, it irked me."
Smith believes that DEI programs are essential for ensuring that all students have an equal opportunity to succeed. He recalled that when he attended the University of Florida, the school emphasized the importance of leadership and advocating for others. "But college athletics certainly isn't the same now," Smith said. "Name, image, and likeness (NIL) brand deals are allowing student-athletes to cash in on their fame."
In light of the university's decision, Smith is demanding reparations. "I want my reparations right now from the University of Florida," he said. "You can look at the old videos and see how many jerseys were walking around. And I didn't receive one red cent."
Smith believes that the elimination of DEI programs is strategically linked to the rise of NIL deals, which have allowed athletes to profit from their image. "You get one, they take the other one away," Smith said. "It's strategic."
Smith also expressed concern that the dismantling of DEI programs will have a negative impact on minority and small businesses, which rely on partnerships with universities for support. "All of that went by the wayside," Smith said of DEI initiatives in corporations. "In other words, they said, 'This is for the moment.'"
Smith urged minority athletes at the University of Florida to be vocal about the university's decision. "Be aware and vocal about this decision by the University who is now closing the doors on other minorities without any oversight," Smith said in his previous statement.
Smith's criticism highlights the growing tension between universities and state governments over DEI programs. The University of Florida is not the only institution facing pressure to eliminate or reduce such programs. Similar debates are occurring at other schools and even in corporate America.
Smith's legacy as a football player and his commitment to social justice make his voice a powerful one in this debate. His criticism of the University of Florida's decision is likely to further galvanize opposition to similar measures elsewhere.
