Harris-Walz Presidency: A Dire Threat to Free Speech in America

Jonathan Turley, a Fox News contributor and constitutional scholar, warns that a potential Harris-Walz presidency poses a significant risk to free speech in the United States, citing the anti-free speech movement's growing influence and similarities between Brazil's recent ban on X and concerns about restrictions in the U.S.

In the wake of Brazil's controversial ban on X, concerns about free speech in the United States are escalating, prompting constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley to issue a dire warning. In a recent interview with Fox News, Turley expressed grave concern over the potential implications of a Harris-Walz presidency, arguing that it would constitute a "perfect nightmare" for free speech.

Turley's fears stem from the anti-free speech movement that has gained momentum around the world and is now making its way to American shores. He emphasizes that traditional methods of convincing people to relinquish their freedom have been largely unsuccessful, leading proponents to explore alternative strategies.

Harris-Walz Presidency: A Dire Threat to Free Speech in America

Harris-Walz Presidency: A Dire Threat to Free Speech in America

One such tactic, Turley points out, is the threat of legal action against social media platforms and their executives. As evidenced by threats of arrest against Elon Musk in Europe, this approach aims to intimidate voices of dissent.

Furthermore, Turley highlights the growing movement to amend the First Amendment, arguing that such efforts would undermine its fundamental purpose as a shield for individual expression. He cites the example of his colleague's proposal for increased protection through Congress, which he views as a misguided attempt to erode free speech.

Harris-Walz Presidency: A Dire Threat to Free Speech in America

Harris-Walz Presidency: A Dire Threat to Free Speech in America

According to Turley, free speech is the defining issue of this election, not democracy itself. He draws parallels to the 1800 presidential election, where Thomas Jefferson defeated John Adams solely on the basis of free speech.

The potential of a Harris-Walz presidency, Turley argues, would be particularly perilous for free speech. He points to Vice President Harris's previous statements indicating her willingness to support the censorship of opposing views, such as her call for the removal of former President Trump from Twitter.

Harris-Walz Presidency: A Dire Threat to Free Speech in America

Harris-Walz Presidency: A Dire Threat to Free Speech in America

Harris's connections to alleged censorship efforts during the Biden-Harris administration further raise concerns, according to Turley. He cites Harris's support for the removal of former President Trump from Twitter and her comments that social media platforms bear responsibility for understanding their power.

In conclusion, Jonathan Turley's warning serves as a stark reminder of the importance of preserving free speech in America. He urges voters to prioritize this issue in the upcoming election and to reject candidates who support policies that would infringe upon this fundamental right.

Harris-Walz Presidency: A Dire Threat to Free Speech in America

Harris-Walz Presidency: A Dire Threat to Free Speech in America