Kamala Harris' Policy Reversals on Transgender Care Under Scrutiny After Presidential Debate

Time magazine has been forced to correct its coverage of the ABC News Presidential Debate after incorrectly reporting that former President Trump's statement about Vice President Kamala Harris' support of free gender-transition treatment for detained migrants was "false."

In the wake of the heated presidential debate between former President Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris, Time magazine has been forced to issue a correction to its coverage after falsely reporting that Trump's statement about Harris' previous support for gender-transition treatments for detained migrants was "false."

During the debate, Trump highlighted Harris' past position on transgender care as one of many examples of her "far-left" views that she has since reversed. However, Time initially reported that Trump's statement was "false," prompting criticism on social media.

Kamala Harris' Policy Reversals on Transgender Care Under Scrutiny After Presidential Debate

Kamala Harris' Policy Reversals on Transgender Care Under Scrutiny After Presidential Debate

Following scrutiny, Time has corrected its coverage, acknowledging that Harris had indeed filled out a presidential candidate questionnaire in 2019 where she pledged support for taxpayer-funded gender transition treatment for detained immigrants.

In a separate development, CNN has also brought Harris' previous position back into the spotlight after senior editor Andrew Kaczynski reported on a recently uncovered 2019 ACLU candidate questionnaire featuring Harris' policy position on transgender care.

Kamala Harris' Policy Reversals on Transgender Care Under Scrutiny After Presidential Debate

Kamala Harris' Policy Reversals on Transgender Care Under Scrutiny After Presidential Debate

In the questionnaire, Harris pledged support for policies ensuring that federal prisoners and detainees are able to obtain medically necessary care for gender transition while incarcerated or detained, including surgical care. She emphasized that transition treatment is a medical necessity.

CNN anchor Erin Burnett expressed surprise over Harris' past stance, stating that it would be difficult to imagine taxpayer-funded gender transitions for detained migrants as a policy proposal.

Kamala Harris' Policy Reversals on Transgender Care Under Scrutiny After Presidential Debate

Kamala Harris' Policy Reversals on Transgender Care Under Scrutiny After Presidential Debate

Amid the renewed scrutiny over her past position, Harris spokesperson Michael Tyler has denied that the policy is part of her current campaign platform. In an interview with Fox News' "America's Newsroom," Tyler stated that Harris' current position on transgender care is not the same as what she expressed in the 2019 questionnaire.

Trump's statement about Harris' support for transgender care for detained migrants drew mixed reactions from the media. Some commentators labeled it as absurd, while others acknowledged Harris' past position but mocked Trump's delivery or questioned his intent.

Kamala Harris' Policy Reversals on Transgender Care Under Scrutiny After Presidential Debate

Kamala Harris' Policy Reversals on Transgender Care Under Scrutiny After Presidential Debate

Marc Lamont Hill, a former CNN commentator, called it "the WILDIEST thing I've ever heard in any debate. EVER," while Susan Glasser of The New Yorker suggested that Trump made the concept up during the debate.

However, other commentators, such as Jennifer Senior of The Atlantic and Michael Weiss of The Insider, reported Trump's statement verbatim without explicitly mentioning Harris' past support for the policy.

The debate over Harris' policy reversals highlights the complex and evolving nature of political discourse in the United States. It also underscores the importance of accurate reporting and fact-checking, especially in high-stakes political events such as presidential debates.

As the election season progresses, it is likely that further scrutiny will be given to the candidates' policy positions and past statements, shaping the public's perception of their credibility and consistency.