Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have embarked on a three-day visit to Nigeria, aiming to boost their popularity and showcase their philanthropic efforts. However, royal watchers question their motives and point to the trip's resemblance to a royal tour.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's arrival in Nigeria has sparked a flurry of attention, with some observers questioning their motives and the nature of their visit. The couple, who have been outspoken about their desire for privacy, have chosen to embark on a highly publicized tour of the African nation.
Royal watcher Hilary Fordwich expressed her preference for a more independent correspondent to cover the trip, citing concerns about the potential for biased reporting. Fordwich also pointed to the irony of Harry and Meghan's desire for privacy while engaging in a high-profile tour.
The timing of the trip is significant, as it coincides with Princess of Wales Kate Middleton's ongoing cancer treatment. This has led to speculation that the couple's visit may be a thinly veiled attempt to overshadow the royal family's focus on Kate's health.
However, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's PR team insists that the purpose of the trip is to highlight the Invictus Games and promote their philanthropic efforts. They argue that Nigeria's first participation in the games in 2023 warrants recognition.
The couple's itinerary includes a range of activities, including a military training session, a reception for military families, and a polo fundraiser for Nigeria: Unconquered. Meghan Markle will co-host an event on Women in Leadership, drawing attention to her recent revelation of her Nigerian heritage.
Some commentators see the trip as a strategic move to repair the couple's image and counter the negative publicity they have received in recent years. They suggest that by focusing on philanthropy and African interests, Harry and Meghan can win back the support of women, who have largely turned against them.
Others believe that the trip is simply a publicity stunt designed to keep the couple in the headlines. They argue that the couple's departure from royal duties was a calculated move to control their own narrative and maximize their earnings.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
