Rutgers head coach Greg Schiano's decision to run the ball twice, resulting in a touchdown as time expired, has sparked controversy and drawn criticism from Howard head coach Larry Scott.
In a lopsided game between Rutgers and Howard, the Scarlet Knights led by a commanding margin of 38-7 with only 15 seconds remaining. Despite the overwhelming advantage, Rutgers head coach Greg Schiano opted against taking a knee to end the game and instead chose to run the ball twice. The second run resulted in a touchdown as time expired, increasing the final score to 44-7.
This decision has drawn criticism from Howard head coach Larry Scott, who expressed his displeasure with Schiano's play-calling. Scott stated that he would have handled the situation differently and believed that Rutgers' lack of sportsmanship was unnecessary.
Rutgers HC Greg Schiano's Controversial Play-Calling Draws Criticism
Schiano defended his decision, denying that he was intentionally running up the score. He emphasized that his players had earned the opportunity to play and that he was simply following the rules of the game.
However, Scott's criticism is not the first time Schiano has faced backlash for similar actions. In 2012, while coaching the Tampa Bay Buccaneers against the Giants, Schiano instructed his team to continue fighting until the final whistle, even when the game was out of reach. This led to a confrontation with Giants head coach Tom Coughlin.
Rutgers HC Greg Schiano's Controversial Play-Calling Draws Criticism
Schiano's penchant for playing until the final second has become a signature aspect of his coaching style. While some may question the ethics of such play-calling, Schiano believes that it reflects his competitive spirit and commitment to his players.
The final play of the game against Howard has not only reignited the debate surrounding Schiano's coaching philosophy but has also raised questions about the boundaries of sportsmanship in college football.
Rutgers HC Greg Schiano's Controversial Play-Calling Draws Criticism
Some argue that Schiano's decision to run the ball was disrespectful to Howard and that it undermined the spirit of the game. They believe that once a team has established a clear lead, it is unnecessary and unsportsmanlike to continue playing.
Others maintain that Schiano was within his rights to play until the end and that his actions were not malicious. They argue that players deserve the opportunity to gain valuable experience, regardless of the score.
Ultimately, the decision of whether or not Schiano's play-calling was ethical is a matter of opinion. However, the controversy surrounding his actions highlights the importance of sportsmanship and respect in college football.
