Elon Musk and Laura Ingraham have condemned a New York Times article that claims the US Constitution is one of the biggest threats to the country. The article's author, Jennifer Szalai, argues that the Constitution's Electoral College system and originalist interpretations have led to authoritarianism and dysfunction.
Elon Musk and Fox News host Laura Ingraham have joined a chorus of critics slamming a controversial New York Times article that asserts the US Constitution poses a "threat" to the nation.
The Constitution Under Fire: New York Times Writer Calls It a "Threat" to America
The article, penned by NYT book critic Jennifer Szalai, argues that the Constitution's Electoral College system and originalist interpretations have enabled antidemocratic outcomes, including former President Donald Trump's election and the reversal of Roe v. Wade.
"The document that’s supposed to be a bulwark against authoritarianism can end up fostering the widespread cynicism that helps authoritarianism grow," Szalai writes.
The Constitution Under Fire: New York Times Writer Calls It a "Threat" to America
She also criticizes the Electoral College for allowing Trump to become president despite losing the popular vote. "Trump owes his political ascent to the Constitution, making him a beneficiary of a document that is essentially antidemocratic and, in this day and age, increasingly dysfunctional," Szalai asserts.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk took to Twitter to condemn the article, stating, "They want to overthrow the Constitution." He added, "Long Live America and our Constitution!"
The Constitution Under Fire: New York Times Writer Calls It a "Threat" to America
Laura Ingraham, host of "The Ingraham Angle" on Fox News, questioned the motives of the New York Times. "Does the NYT hate the Constitution? Of course it does," she said.
Critics argue that the article's attack on the Constitution is misguided and overlooks its enduring strength as a framework for a free and democratic society. The originalist interpretation, which seeks to interpret the Constitution based on its original intent, has played a crucial role in protecting individual rights and limiting government overreach.
The Electoral College, while imperfect, serves as a compromise between popular vote and state representation, ensuring that all states have a voice in presidential elections. Its existence has prevented candidates from winning the presidency based solely on the popular vote in heavily populated states.
The New York Times article has sparked a heated debate about the future of the Constitution. While some may question its efficacy in the modern age, it remains a cornerstone of American democracy and a symbol of the nation's founding principles.
It is important to engage in thoughtful discussions and debates about how to preserve the integrity and relevance of the Constitution while addressing the challenges of the 21st century. However, undermining its fundamental principles and seeking to "overthrow" it would be a grave mistake that could jeopardize the republic that the Constitution has safeguarded for over two centuries.
